Google Illuminate - creates a radio interview from a research paper

Google Labs has a long history of inviting users to experiment with cutting-edge tech. Gmail was once a private beta project. Illuminate is a project that turns academic papers into AI-generated audio discussions in the style of an NPR podcast. The idea is simple: Google's LLM Gemini generates a paper summary and a Q&A. Two AI-generated voices, a male interviewer and a female expert, will guide you through a short interview describing the paper. You can listen to some of the samples on the Google Illuminate website. This is useful, letting me listen to engaging summaries of the ever-growing stack of research papers I must read as I exercise or drive. It can also be easily adapted to other narration forms for different use cases. Illuminate is in private beta, and you can join the waitlist here.

Recreating the DEC PDP-10 at the MIT AI Lab

 

I came across this today: a modern replica of the Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-10 mainframe computer. What makes this so wonderful is that it's not just a simulation of the PDP-10's OS and software running on a Raspberry Pi but also includes a facsimile of the original front panel.

The PiDP-10 front panel is not just a mock-up but allows you to control and interact with the PiDP-10 exactly as an operator would have done back then. I used a PDP-10 when I did my MSc in AI at Essex University in 1985. The PDP-10 was popular with "university computing facilities and research labs during the 1970s, the most notable being Harvard University's Aiken Computation Laboratory, MIT's AI Lab and Project MAC, Stanford's SAIL, Computer Center Corporation (CCC), ETH (ZIR), and Carnegie Mellon University. Its main operating systems, TOPS-10 and TENEX, were used to build out the early ARPANET. For these reasons, the PDP-10 looms large in early hacker folklore". 

Thus, the PiDP-10 comes with MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab, "the PDP-10 formed the heart of a large array of connected hardware, and its ITS operating system became a playground for computer scientists and hackers alike. MACLISP, emacs, the earliest AI demos, they were born on the 10, running ITS." I'm particularly interested to see SHRDLU - the first AI to understand a 3D blocks-world. I remember doing assignments in LISP on that and how, in the mid-80s, it was the considered the cutting edge of AI.

There's a waiting list to buy the PiDP-10 from Obsolescence Guaranteed, which I have eagerly joined.

GraphRAG - Using Knowledge Graphs to Empower LLMs

LLM-generated knowledge graph built from a private dataset using GPT-4 Turbo (Microsoft, 2024)

Back in the 1980s, I did my PhD in AI using Sowa's Conceptual Graphs, what we would now refer to as knowledge graphs. We've known for a while that providing LLMs with specific knowledge in the form of RAGs improves their accuracy. However, we've experimented with providing knowledge to LLMs in more explicit formats, for example, as cases in case-based reasoning augmented RAGs. Now, Microsoft has announced  GraphRAG, its Knowledge Graph-augmented LLM tool. The interesting thing about GraphRAG is that the knowledge graph is created by an LLM before being used to guide the LLM's retrieval. The LLM is, therefore, bootstrapping itself and "By using the LLM-generated knowledge graph, GraphRAG vastly improves the “retrieval” portion of RAG, populating the context window with higher relevance content, resulting in better answers and capturing evidence provenance."

Read Microsoft's announcement GraphRAG: Unlocking LLM discovery on narrative private data. For more information about the GraphRAG project, watch this video.

ChatGPT now has a memory - but it's naive

Screenshot - OpenAI

Last year, during the hype surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs), I published a position paper and wrote in this blog that LLMs, like ChatGPT, would need a persistent memory of their conversations to be most helpful. It's tough to converse intelligently with somebody with no memory. We value old friends so much because we know they recall events relevant to us, both good and bad, going back many years or even decades. 

However, managing that memory responsibly is a nontrivial task. Moreover, if virtual assistants based on LLMs become part of our daily lives, as it seems they will, their memory may have to be maintained over many years, perhaps even decades. I don't believe ChatGPT's memory management will be sufficient for this task.

My research has primarily focussed on case-based reasoning (CBR), a memory-based method. Interestingly, as a research community, we didn't consider how our case-bases (the memory) should be maintained over time. This was because we'd been focused on building systems in the early years of the discipline. Only when the systems matured did we realise our memories needed to be maintained. This happened in the late 1990s and centred on the work of Wilson and Leake, for example, "Categorizing case-base maintenance: Dimensions and directions". This work sparked a new line of research within CBR, leading to "Remembering to Forget" becoming a memorable paper title.

Consider this scenario: you've asked ChatGPT to remember your partner's name and that they like dark chocolate. You subsequently break up and acquire a new partner who prefers milk chocolate. You later ask ChatGPT to advise on buying a present. ChatGPT recommends dark chocolate in a gift box. Its memory is out of date, and the recommendation is inappropriate. The event of breaking up with your previous partner should have triggered a memory management process. These triggers are detailed in Wilson and Leake's paper in a comprehensive framework for maintaining memories. 

OpenAI's memory for ChatGPT is described in a FAQ webpage that is naive in its simplicity. The memory is described as a "notepad" with individual memories jotted down sequentially on it. Users can review and delete individual memories. But this is far too simplistic an approach to manage an AI assistant's memory that may have to span many years. An AI Assistant's memory must be structured, and policies and procedures will be required to manage it. OpenAI and others who build AI assistants with long-term memories should draw upon the expertise of case-based reasoners who have been managing memory for decades. Otherwise, they are in danger of reinventing the wheel.

Coincidentally, I've just been reading Why We Remember by Charan Ranganath. This book provides a fascinating insight into how the brain processes memories and highlights how little we currently know about this crucial aspect of ourselves.

Call for Papers: Workshop on CBR and LLMs

Generated by Gemini

Last year was the most remarkable year in AI that I can recall. Large Language Models (LLMs) like Chat-GPT changed the public perception of AI, and what had previously seemed like science fiction was now a reality. I was only tangentially familiar with LLM research, having been working on emotion recognition in speech with a PhD student. However, last year, I started diving into LLM research in-depth, which, as one commentator said, was like trying to drink water from a fire hydrant, such was the volume of publications through places like arXiv.

I view all problems through a lens coloured by case-based reasoning (CBR), my long-term AI research speciality. I quickly saw synergies between CBR and LLMs where both could benefit from each other's approaches, and I wrote up my initial thoughts and published them on arXiv.

CBR has an annual international conference, and I proposed the idea of a workshop at the conference on CBR-LLM synergies to some colleagues, who all thought this was a great idea and agreed to co-organise the workshop with me. The Case-Based Reasoning and Large Language Models Synergies Workshop will take place at  ICCBR 2024 in Mérida, Yucatán, México on July 1st 2024. The Call for papers can be accessed here, and submissions are via EasyChair. 

A Long-term Memory for ChatGPT

Generated by Gemini

In October last year, I published a short position paper, A Case-Based Persistent Memory for a Large Language Model, arguing that ChatGPT and other LLMs need a persistent long-term memory of their interactions with a user to be truly useful. It seems OpenAI was listening because a couple of days ago, they announced that ChatGPT would retain a persistent memory of chats across multiple conversations. As reported in Wired, the memory will be used to add helpful background context to your prompts, improving their specificity to you over time. I argued in my October paper that the LLM community should look to the Case-Based Reasoning community for help with memory since we are the discipline within AI that has been explicitly concerned with memory for decades. For example, we long ago realised that while remembering is vital, a memory must also be able to forget some things to remain functional. This is a non-trivial problem discussed in Smyth and Keane's 1997 paper Remembering To Forget: A Competence-Preserving Case Deletion Policy for Case-Based Reasoning Systems. The synergies between CBR and LLMs will be the focus of a workshop at ICCBR-24 in July in Merida, Yucatán, México.

Intelligent Agents: the transformative AI trend for 2024

Generated by DALL-E

As we move into 2024, the spotlight in AI will increasingly be on Intelligent Agents. As outlined in the influential paper by Wooldridge and Jennings (1995), agents are conceptualized as systems with autonomy, social ability, reactivity, and pro-activeness. Their evolution signifies a shift from mere tools to entities that can perceive, interact, and take initiative in their environments, aligning with the vision of AI as a field aiming to construct entities exhibiting intelligent behaviour.

The fusion of theory and practice in agent development is critical. Agent theories focus on conceptualizing and reasoning about agents' properties, architectures translate these theories into tangible systems, and languages provide the framework for programming these agents. This triad underpins the development of agents that range from simple automated processes to systems embodying human-like attributes such as knowledge, belief, and intention.

Ethan Mollick's exploration of GPTs (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) as interfaces to intelligent agents adds a contemporary dimension to this conversation. GPTs, in their current state, demonstrate the foundational capabilities for agent development - from structured prompts facilitating diverse tasks to integration with various systems. As envisioned by Wooldridge, Jennings, and Mollick, the future points towards agents integrated with a myriad of systems capable of tasks like managing expense reports or optimizing financial decisions.

Yet, this promising future has its challenges. The road to developing fully autonomous intelligent agents is fraught with technical and ethical considerations. Issues like logical omniscience in agent reasoning, the relationship between intention and action, and managing conflicting intentions remain unresolved. Mollick raises concerns about the vulnerabilities and risks in an increasingly interconnected AI landscape.

The explosion in Agents will be fuelled, like throwing gasoline on a fire, by the opening of OpenAI's GPT store sometime in early 2024. Many online pundits will think "agents" are a new thing! But as this post shows, the ideas and vast body of AI research dates back to the mid-1990s and early 2000s; as exemplified by The Trading Agents Competition.

Intelligent Agents represent a transformative trend in AI for 2024 and beyond. Their development, grounded in a combination of theoretical and practical advancements, paves the way for a future where AI is not just a tool but a proactive, interactive, and intelligent entity.